T Polyphilus ([info]paradoxosalpha) wrote,
@ 2007-12-23 15:06:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
The Islam of To Mega Therion: Fourth Pillar
The fourth act of worship enjoined upon obedient Muslims in the Hadith of Gabriel is sawm: the fast of Ramadan. Actually, the term sawm applies to other religious fasting in Islam, but only the Ramadan observance is included as one of the five obligatory deeds.

There seems to be no evidence that Muhammad and the first Muslims ever fasted prior to the Hijrah--the emigration from Mecca to Medina. A single Meccan sura mentions sawm, but does so in a context that indicates abstinence from speech rather than the food and sexual contact usually referenced by sawm (19:26). In Medina, Muhammad instituted a fast on the day of Ashura (10 Muharram), which may have been taken over from local Jewish practice, possibly the Yom Kippur holiday. The Qur’anic basis of the Ramadan observance is found in 2:183-5, as follows:
O believers, fasting is enjoined on you as it was on those before you, so that you might become disciplined. Fast a fixed number of days, but if someone is ill or is travelling (he should complete) the number of days (he had missed); and those who find it hard to fast should expiate by feeding a poor person. But he who gives more of his free will, it is better for him. And it is better for you who fast, if only you knew. Ramadan is the month in which the Qur’an was revealed as guidance to man and clear proof of the guidance, and the criterion (of truth). So when you see the new moon, you should fast the whole month; but a person who is ill or travelling should fast on other days, as God wishes ease and not hardship for you, so that you complete the fixed number of fasts, and give glory to God for the guidance, and be grateful.
Ramadan comprehends the Laylat al-Qadr, the night commemorating the initial revelation of the Qur’an, and ends with Eid ul-Fitr, a communal fast-breaking celebration. In practice, Ramadan often becomes an affair of both fasting and feasting, as nighttime repasts make up for the restraint of the days. Those who are able to do so sometimes simply sleep during the day, and thus exchange the hours of activity and dormancy, making the observance one of sleep-discipline as much as food-control.

One might compare Ramadan to the twenty-two-day period of High Holy Days observed by some Thelemites, ranging from the Feast for the Supreme Ritual on March 20, through the Three Days of the Writing of the Book of the Law on April 8-10. Ramadan is the ninth month of the purely lunar Islamic calendar, and thus it gradually cycles throughout the solar seasons, and opinions differ regarding which season of the pre-Islamic lunisolar calendar Ramadan would have denoted. Nevertheless, the Thelemic High Holy Days correspond roughly to the foremost fasting season of Christian tradition, the forty days of Lent prior to Easter. Orthodox Easter fell on April 10, 1904 e.v., and the Islamic fast day of Ashura was on March 28 that year.

Fasting regardless of season is highly prized in the Sufi traditions of Islam, where it is often associated with sleeplessness as a chief instrument of personal virtue, subduing the lower self. “Little food, little sleep, little talk,” says an immemorial maxim. Al-Hujwiri writes that “Fasting is really abstinence, and this includes the whole method of Sufism.” An innovative fasting technique characteristic of Sufi practice is the sawm da’udi, alternating single days of total fasting with single days of ordinary eating, in order to maintain physical consciousness of hunger. Some Sufis have starved themselves to death; others noted for the rigor of their fasting have lived many years beyond common life expectancies. (There may indeed be aging-related medical benefits to fasting.) Although fasting is a conspicuous and important part of Sufi practice, many Sufi teachers have warned against “idolatry of the stomach” by which this effort would eclipse its goal of intimacy with God, and they have recommended moderation in fasting. The Bengali Sufi saint Sharafuddin Maneri emphasized the value of fasting during Ramadan as a means to the avoidance of drowsiness (Letter 72).

Among various other mystical techniques and mechanisms, Crowley does not fail to discuss fasting. As a rule, he counsels moderation. In Liber E he advises aspirants that “the presence of food in the stomach, even in minute quantities, makes the practices [of pranayama] very difficult,” (IV.6) but he also instructs them to “ascertain how many hours you can subsist without food or drink before your working capacity is seriously interfered with.” (VI.2) In Liber Astarte, he observes:
Yet as in mortal love arises a distaste for food, or a pleasure in things naturally painful, this perversion should be endured and allowed to take its course. Yet not to the interference with natural bodily health, whereby the instrument of the soul might be impaired. (v. 34)
Crowley’s discussion “Of the Banishings, and of the Purifications” asserts that the “Ancient Magicians” engaged in rigorous fasting “so that the body itself might destroy anything extraneous to the bare necessity of its existence.” But he claims that modern sophistication permits the neglect of such an “external” regimen, in favor of the most scrupulous “internal purification”: “We may eat meat, provided that in doing so we affirm that we eat it in order to strengthen us for the special purpose of our proposed invocation.” (Magick, pp. 211-12) (On the dietary constraints of the Ancient Magicians, compare also Anna Kingsford’s Clothed with the Sun, No. XVIII.)

Crowley does mandate fasting for one particular operation: eucharistic magick, for which he requires “fasting for some hours previous.” This stipulation actually inclines Thelemic praxis in the direction of the perpetual fasts of Sufism, since “A Eucharist of some sort should most assuredly be consummated daily by every Magician, and he should regard it as the main sustenance of his magical life.” (Magick, p. 269. See also Liber Aleph, 16.) The only eucharistic ritual that Crowley published for general daily use by individual Thelemites is the Mass of the Phoenix (Liber XLIV), which takes place at sunset. Thus the magician celebrating that Mass would break his fast at sunset each day, just like the Ramadan fast: “Eat and drink until the white thread of dawn appears clear from the dark line, then fast until the night falls.” (Qur’an 2:187) In Muslim communities it is traditional to signal nightfall during Ramadan with the shot of a cannon.
I entered in with woe; with mirth
I now go forth, and with thanksgiving,
To do my pleasure on the earth
Among the legions of the living.

*BOOM*

(Other posts in this series...)



(19 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]royalbananafish
2007-12-23 09:38 pm UTC (link)
There is a long tradition of female saints starving themselves to death. The most pious and holy were said to exist on air, or a diet of daily communion wafers. If you are interested in this, there is a book called The Anorexic Saints.

Also, in the strict Catholicism of days gone by, it was considered a sin to eat before taking communion at Mass.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 01:44 am UTC (link)
I have read in this field, as it happens. The most noted treatments of the topic of fasting among pious women and female saints of the Christian Middle Ages are probably Holy Anorexia by Rudolph Bell, and Caroline Walker Bynum's Holy Feast and Holy Fast, of which I prefer the latter in terms of both its thesis and methods. I haven't seen anything in the literature of Islamic mysticism and sainthood that suggests a similar gendered emphasis, however. Based on Walker's ideas, one might expect to see it; the idea is basically that women who are charged with food preparation would come to see control over food as a primary means of religious expression. But if anything, I notice the practice of fasting emphasized by and among male Muslim mystics more than female ones. For instance, despite her general poverty and asceticism, fasting plays no conspicuous role in the usual stories about the famous female Sufi saint Rabi'a. Going the other direction, however, the misogyny of some Sufis has been expressed in an unwillingness to touch food prepared by women.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]omphalos111
2007-12-23 10:21 pm UTC (link)
Glad to see you getting more time on hand so that you returned to this series. As I noted in my e-mail to you I had missed it :)

Inspirational as always.

As an example of fasting we have incorporated fasting in our household of the Lent season, though we start at the "Feast of the Star", ending with the Feast of the Supreme Ritual, from which the High holy Season of 22 days marks a period of feasting rather than fasting.

It is also a period where we contemplate the previous year and the year to come.

We also try to teach people to fast before they take the Sacrament at our local Sanctuary.

Edited at 2007-12-23 10:23 pm UTC

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 04:35 am UTC (link)
Well, I'm going to try to get the fifth pillar up (*ahem*) before the new term starts in January, and hopefully I'll have more posts in the Islam & Thelema series thereafter. Unfortunately, my original plans to be doing some work on Islam at school during the winter have fallen through, so there's less prospect than formerly that I will be generating a huge stream of posts in this series over the next few months.

As I probably indicated with too much subtlety in the essay above, I'm inclined to see feasting and fasting as complementary aspects of the ritual control of eating. (This idea is also integral to Bynum's book mentioned in my reply to royalbananafish.) Fast and feast are often combined in the same holidays--certainly (de facto though not de jure) in Ramadan. My own practice points towards the frequent feast in the form of daily Eucharists during the 22-day holy season, which consequently involves daily fasting as a "condition."

I like your identification of the Feast of the Star(s)-->Feast for the Supreme Ritual season, even though I would not tend to exercise it as "Lenten" or in any way penitential or expiatory. I guess it would vary for leap years, but do you ordinarily count it as 49 days?

Recently, I've been realizing that my observances have been bringing me to the apprehension of a two-month "chilling" season that starts with the Feast of the Dragon, and works through to the Feast of Pan on January 1. It contains and is punctuated by the Feast for the First Initiation of the Prophet, the Greater Feast of the Prophet, the Feast of the Annihilation of the Prophet, and the Winter Solstice. I'm starting to think of these rather tongue-in-cheek as the "Unholy Days," and the series of feasts from the Lion-Serpent to Crowleymas as the "Low Holy Days."

It's great that you encourage communicants to fast. Besides my web-published essay I fear I have done nothing to educate our laity in this regard.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]omphalos111
2007-12-24 11:48 pm UTC (link)

Looking forward to the fifth pillar then ;) But seriously it is better that you give the series your best and only do it when you have time, continuing your excellent quality, rather than mass producing mediocrities.

As for the Feast of the Star -> Feast for the Supreme Ritual season, it is not so much a Lent (as in it being a penitentiary and expiatory season) nor the amount of days indicated, though 49 is rather interesting isn't it, but would be difficult to ascertain if one does not move back the Feast of the Star.

They function more like a Fast, and reflection in preparation of the High Holy Thelemic Season (I love that phrase and I am keeping it ;) which indicates a "general discharge of one's superfluous force in the other [and] implies periodical nourishment." In other words the two seasons compliment each other in the same way you note above but on a seasonal rather than a daily scale.

I like the 22 day intake of the magical nourishment with fasting and feasting and will ponder that some more. Interesting ideas as well concerning the unholy and low holy days.

We have included it as part of our newly developed catechumen program, but in the past it was more informal where we talked about it, which we still do, but it was left rather haphazardly to whether someone breached the subject. Your essay is great and served as one of my inspirations to formalize the teaching.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]iao131
2007-12-24 12:18 am UTC (link)
93 paradoxosalpha,

Inspiring, perhaps, but I have many (hopefully constructive) criticisms:

a) One might compare Ramadan to the twenty-two-day period of the High Holy Days in Thelemic custom, ranging from the Feast for the Supreme Ritual on March 20, through the Three Days of the Writing of the Book of the Law on April 8-10.

Excuse me... what? If this is 'Thelemic custom' it is entirely within a small subset of the OTO. There is absolutely NO, ZERO mention of 22 days in Liber AL or "High Holy Days" of Thelema. I find that phrase disgusting, personally. Why? Because Liber AL clearly says in chapter 2, "A feast every day in your hearts in the joy of my rapture! A feast every night unto Nu, and the pleasure of uttermost delight!" Every day (and night & everything that lives) is holy. To call a certain bunch of days High Holy Days is not only Judeo-Christian-Islamic to the core but implies the other days are not as holy.

Secondly, what does this have to do with Ramadan whatsoever? I see absolutely zero connection - in fact, in Thelema there are a lot of feasts proscribed but I dare you to find me a passage that says "fast for X days or on X day."

b) Nevertheless, the Thelemic High Holy Days correspond roughly to the foremost fasting season of Christian tradition, the forty days of Lent prior to Easter.

Again: Thelemic High Holy Days do not exist in relation to any Thelemic book. This is either your or the OTO's creation, and you speak as if it is an accepted fact among Thelemites. It isn't, brother.

Secondly, they 'roughly' correspond meaning they barely do. OK, they are in the same area of the year, sure, but do they have ANY relation to each other except for being somewhat close? These connections are both spurious and misleading.

c) Among various other mystical techniques and mechanisms, Crowley does not fail to discuss fasting.

Your explanation here is also highly misleading. He does NOT endorse fasting as a mystical techinque and mechanism as you say here. He says this in Liber E entirely to find out your 'physical limitations' as the title of the chapter clearly says in big type. In Liber Astarte he says exactly the opposite of fasting, saying that one should not interfere with bodily health. You yourself admit in the next paragraph that Crowley does NOT endorse fasting in general; in fact, he says the opposite that we should eat meat and such (and Liber AL is replete with references to feasts... and, again, never to fasts)..

d) Crowley does mandate fasting for one particular operation: eucharistic magick, for which he requires “fasting for some hours previous.” This stipulation actually inclines Thelemic praxis in the direction of the perpetual fasts of Sufism

Really? He 'requires' this? Or it simply, and obviously, helps?

Secondly, how does this at all incline Thelemic praxis in teh direction of the perpetual fasts of Sufism? This is the worst jump of logic I have seen in a long time, brother. Either you are intentionally misleading people, your conclusions are incredibly weak, or you are so narrowly attempting to find parallels that you superimpose them where they don't exist... which is it exactly? I wish these connections were much stronger, but this has convinced me that Ramadan (and lent) has absolutely nothing to do with Thelema.

65 & 210,
IAO131

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 02:29 am UTC (link)
I'll indulge your lettered points.

a1) Your disgust is duly noted. The fact is that Thelemic observance of the March 20 - April 10 period of holy days is not unique to OTO, although neither is it ubiquitous in or endorsed by the Order. As far as I have been able to surmise, it was invented within the College of Thelema--but this inference from the spread of the custom is one for which I have no solid proof. (I'd be grateful for further input from readers, who would need to know more about it than you do, evidently.) I present it as an empirically-noted custom among Thelemites, not an edict from the Prophet, and I am perfectly honest in doing so.

Your reading of Liber Legis to the effect that there should be no sacred season(s) in Thelema is entirely unpersuasive. The verses you cite come at the conclusion of the "calendar" passage in Chapter II, in which (per Crowley's commentaries) at least four calendrical feasts are singled out for their peculiar holiness.

a2) Ramadan is the season identified with the reception of the Qu'ran.

b1) I don't know what qualifies as a "Thelemic book" to you. But, as I mentioned, I am genuinely pointing to actual custom among Thelemites, which I most certainly did not originate, nor did OTO. You, on the other hand, seem to be attempting to enforce some sort of Thelemic orthodoxy in which anything not enjoined by the Prophet is forbidden.

b2) The March 20 - April 10 period nearly always falls within, but at least overlaps, the Lenten season ending in Holy Week. The two calendar periods correspond calendrically.

c) I don't see what's misleading. Crowley discusses both advantages and hazards to fasting, while recognizing it as a perennial component of magical and mystical regimens. I provided instances with context.

d1) When Crowley writes that "Without these antecedents [i.e. chastity, fasting, and aspiration] even the Eucharist of the One and Seven is partially--though such is its intrinsic value that it can never be wholly--baulked of its effect," (Magick, p. 269) I understand him to be indicating that in all lesser Eucharists, such as those of Libri XV (two elements) and XLIV (five elements), "these antecedents" are in fact necessary, and thus required in order for the Eucharist to be effective.

d2) A "jump of logic"? If one performs a Eucharist every day, and one fasts for every Eucharist, then one will fast every day. Q.E.D. A "perpetual fast" does not necessarily mean that one never eats, it means that one never surrenders the discipline of fasting; Ramadan goes on forever.

301 & 44,
PA

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]solarmyth
2007-12-24 02:53 am UTC (link)
I first heard of the idea of correlating the 22-day period corresponding between March 20 and April 10 to the Atout of Thoth from Bro. JAE; and, to my knowledge, the idea was original to him. I don't know who came up with the term "High Holy Days."

Regarding AC's views on fasting prior to a eucharistic working, I don't see the language you quote here as a mandate. It seems to me he's simply stating his observations, and even acknowledging that the eucharist will not be wholly baulked of its effect if fasting is neglected. It'll still work, just not as well. Seems to me a "mandate" would involve some kind of direct injunction or exhortation. He may, in fact, have made such a pronouncement somewhere in his voluminous corpus of writings, but you haven't quoted it here if he did.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]omphalos111
2007-12-24 02:59 am UTC (link)
Well [info]paradoxosalpha does make a strong case that it is mandated for complete success with the eucharistic formula, but I agree that it can't be read as an exhortation that those partaking in the eucharist must fast, that only becomes necessary if they want to aspire towards complete success in their use of the formula, which granted not everyone may want to ;)

Edited at 2007-12-24 03:02 am UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]iao131
2007-12-24 03:44 am UTC (link)
93,

The quotation he uses explicitly says "Without these antecedents [i.e. chastity, fasting, and aspiration] even the Eucharist of the One and Seven is partially--though such is its intrinsic value that it can never be wholly--baulked of its effect."

This seems to actually prove exactly the opposite - that not only is it NOT necessary, but the Eucharistic power cannot be entirely 'baulked of its effect.'

65 & 210,
IAO131

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 03:58 am UTC (link)
Not the Eucharistic power in general, but in particular the power of the "Eucharist of the One and Seven," which he has already distinguished from e.g. the Eucharist of the Five (Mass of the Phoenix, among others). I already pointed this out in my initial response to you. I really think if you would go ahead and review the referenced passage of Magick in Theory & Practice with your preconceptions at bay, you will find that I'm pointing out an issue that Crowley raises in very strong terms, but which many Thelemic magicians disregard quite cavalierly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Thelemic fasting? More like Thelemic feasting...
[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 03:51 am UTC (link)
Crowley says particularly that "the Eucharist of One and Seven will not be wholly baulked," but that even that most puissant of Eucharists will be partially baulked, and the others presumably moreso. He gives the three "antecedents" as "conditions," both terms strongly connoting their necessity. Reading the entire passage (from Chapter XX of Magick in Theory & Practice), I really don't think I'm overemphasizing Crowley's insistence.

Regarding JAE, his writing is in fact the earliest source that I have for observing that period as an integral season. The "High Holy Days" I got from The Companions of Monsalvat, although I don't know if it's original with them. I have seen the idea spread considerably in the ten years or more since I first heard of it, and it seems perfectly reasonable that it should have such an appeal. After all, the period commemorates a single, continuous episode in 1904 by which the Law was received, and the 22-fold sequence lends itself to patterns of thought in which we are trained--to say nothing of the provocative climax with the final three trumps.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Thelemic fasting? (part 1)
[info]iao131
2007-12-24 03:45 am UTC (link)
93 paradoxosalpha,

I am whole-heartedly grateful you replied to this, wrapped in your keen intellect rather than being wrapped in malice which is what I often get (and have come to expect from most). I just want to begin this post with saying that your response shows that you deserve my respect and gratitude on multiple fronts. Ass-kissing aside, let us continue:

a1) Your disgust is duly noted.

Honestly, Im not disgusted by it - the 'I find it disgusting' was used to shock and for rhetorical effect. If anything, I find it frustrating.

The fact is that Thelemic observance of the March 20 - April 10 period of holy days is not unique to OTO, although neither is it ubiquitous in or endorsed by the Order. As far as I have been able to surmise, it was invented within the College of Thelema--but this inference from the spread of the custom is one for which I have no solid proof. (I'd be grateful for further input from readers, who would need to know more about it than you do, evidently.) I present it as an empirically-noted custom among Thelemites, not an edict from the Prophet, and I am perfectly honest in doing so.

I think you should clarify this. You write as if every Thelemite knows about and celebrates these High Holy Days. I had never even heard the term, and having grown up Jewish (as opposed to the infinite ex-Christians I find as Thelemites) and heard the phrase thrown around often, I find it kind of silly and it inherently points to Judeo-Christian-Islamic religion. The fact that this isn't even OTO inspired shows that it is, if anything, a few people who know about this concept and celebrate it.

Your reading of Liber Legis to the effect that there should be no sacred season(s) in Thelema is entirely unpersuasive. The verses you cite come at the conclusion of the "calendar" passage in Chapter II, in which (per Crowley's commentaries) at least four calendrical feasts are singled out for their peculiar holiness.

Crowley's Djeridensis commentary says this on this part of Liber Legis: "With abrupt vigour the subject swings over to the triumph of the Masters. Aiwass bids us rise up and awake. He prescribes ways of worship. We are to invoke with joy and beauty. He begins by making a list of rituals and feasts; and in the course of this he works himself up into a state of rapture so that these rites at first clearly defined in order, gather force, wave upon wave, quicker and quicker, until at last he proclaims all times and places as proper for feasts. At the end he exclaims once more that all such pleasures are free from any taint of hidden poison."

This was the view I was taking. I personally find the celebration of the elements much more natural than these High Holy Days. Everyone can observe that the Sun passes through a cycle and we can easily mark the points of the Equinoxes and Solstices as solar-ly important.

I don't know what qualifies as a "Thelemic book" to you.

I was actually referring to the Class A texts, most specifically Liber Legis, and also Liber LXV and Liber VII, and also including ARARITA, Tav, Tzaddi, A'ash, etc. My fault for not clarifying.

But, as I mentioned, I am genuinely pointing to actual custom among Thelemites, which I most certainly did not originate, nor did OTO. You, on the other hand, seem to be attempting to enforce some sort of Thelemic orthodoxy in which anything not enjoined by the Prophet is forbidden

Absolutely not! I am saying that this has no basis in the Thelemic texts, really, and if you take these texts out of the question there is no such thing as Thelema as we know it. We can argue on this point for hours, surely, as it has been done before but I want to make this clear: People can do whatever the hell they Will, but when you make a post called "The Islam of To Mega Therion" you are going to have to back up your claims. If you are going to make a post about "The Islam of post-Crowleyan Thelema" that might be different. I might argue there is no such thing as post-Crowleyan Thelema but, again, that is another topic. Also I am averse to the way you state it as if it is an accepted thing among Thelemites. It is marginal at best. Feel free to fast and feast as you will, brother.

65 & 210,
IAO131

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thelemic fasting? (part 2)
[info]iao131
2007-12-24 03:47 am UTC (link)
93,

I don't see what's misleading. Crowley discusses both advantages and hazards to fasting, while recognizing it as a perennial component of magical and mystical regimens. I provided instances with context.

First of all, you said that fasting was related to "a mystical technique and mechanism." Yes, fasting has been used forever in a myriad of contexts, but he never explicitly says "fasting is a perennial part of magick and/or mysticism." (this is what I feel is misleading) He says its useful in some cases, in Liber E he says its useful to test your physical limits (which has NOTHING to do with mysticism in my opinion), etc. I am averse to the idea that Crowley said fasting is a perennial part of magick and/or mysticism. Buddha himself found that fasting did not get him to the result he desired, therefore he propounded the middle way (for a mystic example).

When Crowley writes that "Without these antecedents [i.e. chastity, fasting, and aspiration] even the Eucharist of the One and Seven is partially--though such is its intrinsic value that it can never be wholly--baulked of its effect," (Magick, p. 269) I understand him to be indicating that in all lesser Eucharists, such as those of Libri XV (two elements) and XLIV (five elements), "these antecedents" are in fact necessary, and thus required in order for the Eucharist to be effective.

Your quote explicitly says "Without these antecedents even the Eucharist of the One and Seven is partially--though such is its intrinsic value that it can never be wholly--baulked of its effect." That seems to support my view that is in fact not necessary, required, or anything of that nature.

A "jump of logic"? If one performs a Eucharist every day, and one fasts for every Eucharist, then one will fast every day. Q.E.D. A "perpetual fast" does not necessarily mean that one never eats, it means that one never surrenders the discipline of fasting; Ramadan goes on forever.

This one is my fault - I was reading quickly at this point and didnt differnetiate between Sufi perpetual feasts and Ramadan, but still: I feel you are conflating a fasting practice and a eucharistic practice (which happens to have fasting as a prerequisite in some cases). Related, but different.

Again: thank you for approaching my criticisms with a balanced head - it says a lot (as do the 301 & 44 but thats more subtle)

65 & 210,
IAO131

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

fasting is a perennial part of magick and/or mysticism
[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 05:45 am UTC (link)
You may be averse to the idea, but it is what Crowley indicates. Review v. 34 of Liber Astarte regarding devotional mysticism, and Chapter XIII of Magick in Theory & Practice, and that's what you'll see. In the one case, he discusses the fact that the "perversion" of fasting is prompted by the very nature of the human psychic constitution in the course of devotional mysticism, and that while fasting has hazards and should not be undertaken for its own sake, it "should be endured and allowed to take its course." In the other, he discusses "Ancient Magicians" and the importance of their dietary constraints, while "In modern times our superior understanding of the essentials of this process enables us to dispense to some extent with its external rigours." (emphasis added)

Of course, you are welcome to take issue with Crowley's assertions on this point, and to claim in counter either
a) that mystics never feel an autonomous impulse towards fasting, but that such behavior always reflects an external compulsion, limited to particular traditions and sects (from which you would presumably exclude Thelema), or
b) that there have been important magical traditions which expressed complete disregard for the regulation of diet.
For my part, although I find generalizations treacherous, I tend to agree with Crowley in this department.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Thelemic fasting? (part 1)
[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 04:56 am UTC (link)
I just tweaked the language of the original essay to eliminate any implication of universality in "Thelemic custom." (Now: "observed by some Thelemites.") I think that addresses the only one of your complaints which I am inclined to credit.

You write: I personally find the celebration of the elements much more natural than these High Holy Days.
That's nice. Each will find different calendrical feasts and fasts more natural according to his own nature, I suppose. I do believe that all days and all nights are sacred to the Lord of Creation, but that doesn't preclude those variations among them that permit them to be variously identified and seasonally grouped.

You also write: when you make a post called "The Islam of To Mega Therion" you are going to have to back up your claims.
Actually, the post is titled "The Islam of To Mega Therion: Fourth Pillar." I provided a link at the foot for the earlier portions of the series, in which I established my intention regarding the provocative title. You didn't read that part or have forgotten it, but I will reprise:
The purpose of the forthcoming series of posts is not to reduce Thelema to an Islamic heresy. Instead, they will be an attempt to re-interpret Thelemic practices and concepts through the lens of certain Islamic doctrinal structures.
Also, I should point out that while the observance of the 22-day holy season is a product of the actual customs and practices of working Thelemites over the last two or three decades at most, the historical basis for the observance is in fact a discrete episode--the defining one, in fact--in the career of the Prophet.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]samael418
2007-12-24 12:55 am UTC (link)
Glad to see that you have resumed this series.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]paradoxosalpha
2007-12-24 05:47 am UTC (link)
It was a hard quarter at school. As much as I would often rather have been writing this stuff, duty called.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Thanks
[info]wireless_soul
2007-12-24 03:14 am UTC (link)
This entire series, taken together, is wonderful. I would urge you to submit this to Agape so more people can read it.

93's

(Reply to this)


(19 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…