T Polyphilus (paradoxosalpha) wrote,
T Polyphilus
paradoxosalpha

AC on N

To a casual reader, Aleister Crowley's essay The Vindication of Nietzsche is a little bewildering: there's hardly anything about Nietzsche in it, other than a brief exoneration of him from the charge of being "German." The reader's familiarity with Nietzsche is overtly assumed. For the most part, the matter of the article consists of vituperation against "English cant and hypocrisy" (the "English" was conspicuously redacted in the original printing during WWI, and quietly ignored in reprints) and long quotes from the holy books of Thelema and Crowley's The World's Tragedy. But these, you see, vindicate Nietzsche as prophet.

The circumstances of the war show Britain at a disadvantage because the Germans are using Nietzsche to good effect. (They were issuing copies of Zarathustra to their soldiers, among other things.) Meanwhile, Britain has comparable--nay, superior!--resources in Darwin and Swinburne, but these are pent up in the "thinking classes," while "prudery" dictates the widespread rejection of the truths that they and Nietzsche offer.

But "even in England" Nietzsche's true agenda is coming to fruition in a "New Religion" illustrated by passages from The Book of the Law. Although Crowley elsewhere described Anna Kingsford as the Baptizer John anticipating his Thelemic movement, in this essay Nietzsche serves as "the dawn-star" to herald a "son of man to be a Sun of men." The latter is of course Aleister Crowley the Thelemic "Apollo ... Antichrist ... Saviour of the Earth!"

I'll drink to that, though I doubt Nietzsche would. It's impressive how well the Magician of Thus Spake Zarathustra Part IV resembles Crowley. His incantation to the "unknown god" correlates richly with Crowley's own doctrine of the Holy Guardian Angel. Nietzsche's Magician was probably modeled on Wagner, but in any case, he's merely one of the "higher men" who are bridges to the overman: roads to be trodden on, not a goal to attain, and certainly less far-seeing than Zarathustra himself.

We've just concluded our "second saintly seminar" at Aum. Ha. Lodge: a six-month study of Nietzsche's Zarathustra and related literature. For the first seminar we read Rabelais. Next year, I think we may tackle Blake's prophecies. Thanks to all who participated, and don't forget to check in to our secret treehouse for some final exchanges on this year's seminar.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

  • 2 comments